Watching The Watchers

“ For the chief of state under modern conditions, a limiting factor is too many subjects and problems in too many areas of government to allow solid understanding of any of them... , This leaves the field open to protective stupidity. Meanwhile bureaucracy, safely repeating today what it did yesterday, rolls on as ineluctably as some vast computer , which once penetrated by error, duplicates it forever.” Barbara W. Tuchman, The March of Folly:From Troy To Vietnam Email:bsqwatch@yahoo.com

Name:
Location: Australia

Thursday, March 30, 2006


Centrelink Psychos and Ozzy Little Hitlers
More Nation Building Bureaucracy?
Or Runaway Gravy Train?

Australia’s bureaucracy is driven to empire building because of two laws and which we have included elsewhere in this and other blogs. That is: Never under any circumstances give back one dollar of any budget once achieved; and do anything and everything possible to increase that budget. The empires must grow at any cost.
(Pissing it up against the wall is preferable to losing it and downsizing your empire and then losing your job as an ozzy little Hitler.)No one has any idea (how convenient) what this corrupt network of government and private bureaucracy has squandered over the past 10 or more years (like the wheat crimes) and not even government but they keep the show going. This is what the two laws demand. And of course we all know about Parkinson’s Law! When combined, corrupt criminal bureaucracy becomes a formidable increasingly blind force and therefore a threat to society and democracy as it resorts to any means to protect and grow empires and budgets.In the process of finding schemes and plans that can be used to dissipate a budget – instead of not spending it and risking losing it – the bureaucrats must call on all their creative abilities to arrive at one or more plan they can use for this purpose. Naturally given they are all mainly products of Australia’s universities this is a challenging requirement but over decades they have aligned themselves with a vast network of public and private bureaucracy to extend the possibilities. (The wheat crimes are the result of a more fundamental problem which is bureaucracy). The universities are one of their most important partners in this endeavour as they have reached a critical mass where they not only cannot pay their way as they have grown their empires but need to milk any source of funds they can find to insure their empires can be maintained. (It is no coincidence that UniSuper is the largest single pool of superannuation funds and engages in insider trading to insure it produces better returns.)A recent advertisement exposes the extent of this relationship and the depths they will go to insure their respective empires and budgets are perpetuated in mutually beneficial alliances that feed of government funds. They produce nothing and there is no identifiable return on investment, juts lots of promises and hype.
Not surprisingly the Centrelink Mafia is at the centre of this “creativity” and it is becoming entrenched as a reliable trough for this army of self-serving parasites to the extent in probably can never be dismantled. This is the main reason Centrelink continues to grow despite the governments dubious claims that employment has declined from 15% to 5%. As mentioned elsewhere any organization would be downsizing with this kind of obvious reduction in services result but not your good old ozzy bureaucracy. It in fact grows and this of course is what gives it away as a typical self-serving bureaucracy of parasites and conforms to the two laws as expected. But back to the example of creative bureaucracy.
As yet another means of extending and growing their empire and blowing their budgets they are increasing the number of psychologists they employ although they are already the largest employers of this professional group and have no proof they are a good return on investment. One of the reasons also has to do with the fact that like lawyers Australian universities have continued to produce far too many and there are large numbers of them unemployable, which again confirms another reason why Australia cannot identify skills needs, shortages and remedies. Remedies before they develop into failures.
Therefore to keep these professionals employed and the university empires intact and even continuing to produce more of them, the mandarin mafia and its extended networks including into universities has devised a plan to claim to need more psychologists across Centrelink. They will pay them between $45,000 and $65,000, so they can maintain a lifestyle befitting an excess of university educated unemployable professionals.
They justify it this way and anyone who is or has been a victim of the Centrelink mafia and as fodder to keep it rolling should understand what government and the Centrelink mafia parasites think of them.
Centrelink states that their customers (you as their necessary 3rd world equivalent fodder) “have diverse and complex psychological barriers to social and economic participation and lack intellectual, cognitive (thinking), behavioral, personality, clinical and many other socially undesirable traits.”
Next time you see an advertisement about Centrelink and the Centrelink mafia urging you to “support the system that supports you”; realize they have a vast corrupted unaccountable empire that ironically to protect its vested interests needs to claim you are some sort of psycho case. This is another example of government needing to subtly scapegoat a certain percentage of the population and their fellow citizens so they can gain a majority support for justifying living off them. Full employment for example can never be one of their priorities and in fact cannot be tolerated by these parasites. Protecting their empires and their jobs –preferably for life – is their main and only priority.
All Centrelink and Centrelink mafia “customers” are subject to what the government dictates yet the Salvation Army Employment Plus, Hillsong and many others in their network are able to fraudulently and corruptly rip government off for millions and no legal action is taken. Once again there is one rule of law for government and their profligate corrupt bureaucracies and another for the unrepresented citizens.
But this same form of scapegoating a percentage of society is exactly the same as the scapegoating and isolation perpetrated by Hitler and his Nazi regime during the mass exterminations 50 years ago.
If one chooses to undertake sufficient analyses one can identify this common necessity across most if not all bureaucracies once they are established. Unfortunately it can also be shown that the Australian media mafia avoids any such comparisons and as occurred 50 years ago, also fails to join the obvious dots. As a media monopoly they are dependent on government not to change media laws that will negatively impact on their businesses and asset values and in addition they profit from large government advertising spending.
The TV advertising for example, by government, that emphasizes Centrelink and for its “customers” to support the system that supports them. In fact the victims are the fodder necessary for the vast corrupt Centrelink network to remain intact and even grow despite the fact and as claimed by government that they have reduced unemployment from 15 % to 5%. This means there are now 10 % fewer Centrelink “customer” so why is this empire still being funded and maintained at the level it was when unemployment was at 15%.
Because their jobs, corrupt networks and empires are the first priority not the citizens. In fact this vast web of bureaucracy needs the equivalent of a small local 3 rd world be maintained forever so they can keep this empire intact and growing each year.
The newly hired psychologists though are unlikely to ever see their role in this light. Once these previously unemployable professionals become Centrelink mafia insiders they are not going to do or say anything that would jeopardize their yearly $50,000. It’s easier in fact to support the Centrelink mafia and if that means marching their scapegoats into gas chambers then if it protects their status, so be it.And many people still ask can it ever happen again! This psychology is a constant therefore the answer is obvious. Groupthink does the rest and as we continually find, including the growth of the Centrelink mafia over decades and the wheat crimes currently.
Bureaucracy has a growing social cost as it resorts to any means to survive, unfortunately it and they are rarely exposed and challenged. Except when it’s too late.
Bury bureaucracy before it buries you!
AN Economic Bill of Rights Now!

Monday, March 27, 2006

Australian Government Has Australia ID Card Step Closer
Can Corrupt Governments Be Trusted?

No! So Act Before Too Late

Australia’s little Hitler’s are using anything and everything to ensure they eventually get every citizen with a national smart ID card. The latest justification for it is one of Howard’s mealy-mouthed political cronies claiming that if every citizen had one it would prevent any more illegal Cornelia Rau detentions and similar events. Only an Australian lawyer as a politician could come up with such cost-benefit logic as these events occur relatively infrequently a national ID card would be overkill. Another reason surfaced after the Cairns cyclone. It would be wonderfully convenient, they claim, for all the “victims” of cyclone Larry and reduce fraud. Ha! The greatest fraud on the Australian people and one they seem unwilling to acknowledge, is their corrupt criminal governments.
If citizens persist in voting for either one of the main dominant corrupt parties it is the same as rewarding them for their criminality.
So what is the real purpose of an ID card, the continuing growth of bureaucracy their empires and budgets of course and their ability to monitor and track every Australian. But of course who monitors and tracks these corrupt scumbag parasites? We would be more than happy to if we had more resources but the best way is an ECONOMIC BILL of RIGHTS.
Once again it proves the two main laws that drive Australian bureaucracy. They must spend their budgets to grow their budgets and empires. And at any cost, including your rights and democracy!
The bureaucrats would be secretly pushing hard for this ID card as they have been for years, to ensure they expand their empires and increase their budgets.To all Australians who value what is left of their democracy. They will not give up on this ID card unless you prevent it.
Bury bureaucracy before it buries you! An Economic Bill of Rights now!
Democracy gives you the choice. Use it or lose it!
So let’s hear from you. Or do you prefer the Tyranny of The Status Quo?

U-beaut Mateship & Ozzy Values
Telstra Corruption Goes Global

The AWB - DFAT - Austrade Model & Diversification

More proof of the innovative diversified corruption that is systemic throughout Australian government is also clearly evident in the Telstra business deals (and a lot more in the Telstra T1 T2 and T3 fraud on the Australian people and SME’s), done though Hong Kong with PCCW. This was a blatant transfer of A$1 billion plus from Telstra to a string of ex-executives (government bureaucrats) of Telstra and their cronies who set this PCCW entity up in Hong Kong and the Caribbean for just such a deal and then resigned from Telstra. They knew they would probably end up being made redundant given the chaos across Telstra so they decided to setup a heist to enrich themselves for the rest of their lives. It needed insiders still employed in Telstra to make it work but it did with great success. Telstra has since had to write off more than a billion over this deal and in the meantime these ex Telstra (mainly finance so they had extensive inside knowledge of how easy it could be achieved) executives are set for life having become multimillionaires and offshore, which makes the possibility of it ever being found out that much more difficult. And once again the government of the day will never allow it to be investigated because it would like the AWB expose more of the Mafiosi mentality of Australia’s “democratically elected leadership”.
It’s noteworthy yet again that Australia’s media status quo has never investigated this scam and never will. This is why it’s a media monopoly and why it gets protected by laws and funded by successive governments.
We would always like to hear from any Telstra or T2 victims.
Support an Economic Bill of Rights and you will have a world first world class clean slate to vote for at the next election instead of more of the political status quo and their mafia.Howard can prioritise putting something like mateship into the Australian constitution and blow $35 million on a constitutional convention for a low priority issue, but would fight tooth and nail to prevent an Economic Bill of Rights. You be the judge what the priority is and its urgency!


Howard Must Protect Criminal Government
Australia’s Dual Rule of Law System
Howard Godfather of Cabinet-Bureaucracy Mafia

Australia’s corrupt and criminal government is being protected from deeper investigation and exposure by Prime Minister Howard and his cabinet of Ozzy lawyers. The media status quo in Australia true to form and type does not seem to have picked up on this yet and the interesting contradiction, and after 3 months of the Cole Right Royal Ridiculous Commission already. Of course they are now publishing the fact that this government of corrupt politicians and bureaucrats has known about blatant criminal activities of this cohort for years but only because the Cole inquiry has put it into the public domain. Of course they also stick to their loyalties and avoid deeper investigation and, including of their convenient neglect of the topic, as this litany of criminality could have been exposed years ago. It was touched on about 97/98 when the ANAO was compelled to do 2 typically flakey audit reports on the meat industry equivalent. The ABC went so far as to produce a documentary about part of it and claimed to have been doing a marvelous investigative story. In fact they avoided the main story which would have taken them further and to the heart of this culture throughout government and its corruption. Australian’s of course believe they were being served by ABC. Fooled again!
Howard and his cabinet (all lawyers by the way and in case we haven’t mentioned it before) are confident they will be able to fob off the majority of Australians and with the help of their media mafia mates. (The more they assist government in this the more government supports their media monopoly and its perpetuation as it comes in mighty handy when the public needs to be quickly manipulated.) There will also be no, or minimal wrist-slapping, accountability in the end and the show will move on. Will it happen again? Of course it will but these scumbags will use this experience to enhance their model so that it will never be uncovered next time. And Howard and his cabinet will all reward themselves – at your expense of course – with all kinds of rewards until they are dead and buried. No one will have the backbone to do a book and/or doco on the true story and Australian democracy will sink a bit further into the sewage and swamp that is the Australian political status quo and their vast network of devious bureaucracy.
Over decades the mandarins have devised a complex system of peers protecting peers and their political mouth-pieces, to insure the public rarely gets wind of the depth and extent of their combined corruption, to the extent it can be said there really is no one watching the watchers. Has anyone noticed the stream of youthful executives from bureaucracy appearing at the Cole inquiry? Some corporate memory but also part of the mandarins’ strategy to protect themselves and remain nameless and faceless. And spineless! Apparently this is the cream of Australia? Hang together instead of hanging alone!
There are two other issues the AWB wheat crimes raise. One is have there ever been direct and indirect kickbacks from the kickbacks and other devious arrangements, paid to any of the politicians and/or bureaucrats in any form of currency either in Australia and/or overseas? For example many of the DFAT bureaucrats have means to bury treasure offshore and which has been a rewarding feature of DFAT/Austrade for decades and continues with impunity. It’s the culture! The other is why this possibility refuses to get covered by the local media mafia and the Cole commission. That’s a hard one!
Howard and his cabinet (Ozzy lawyers and just what kind of oath do these shifty bastards take to qualify anyway? The same one no doubt as the mandarin mafia? Including the code of silence !) must persist in this game of attrition that they are playing with the voting public who put them their to lead (Ha!), because they know that they will beat them down yet again as they always do. Eventually Australian’s will become sufficiently bamboozled and bored and will be flicking to the sports pages a lot quicker until eventually they will accept whatever their leaders (Ozzy lawyers! Wake up voters! ) tell them. Howard being the pathological liar he is and cheered on by his cabinet (Ozzy lawyers in case you weren’t aware.) will relish cooking up a stream of propaganda to explain why there will be no court cases (recall a court can drag more out into the public domain and we can’t have that know can we?) and there will be a series of studies done to find the best solution for the wheat industry and its marketing that will be the best solution for the Australian people and blah! Blah! Blah! Another blow to democracy!
So anyway where is the ANZAC spirit when needed? Or is that just an ongoing versioned feature of their propaganda?

Friday, March 24, 2006

See our other blogs:
http://governmentcrime.blogspot.com
http://4idtvforum.blogspot.com
http://economicbillofrights.blogspot.com
http://industryassistance.blogspot.com

Thursday, March 23, 2006


SME’s Paying For More Corruption!
Coonans ICT Report Sources Exposed

AGIMO and NOIE Have Squandered Billions

This weeks report published By Senator Coonan, Howard’s Communications Minister,
(see http://4idtvforum.blogspot.com ) supportingthe sell-out of local ICT, had a familiar fishy smell about it and checking through our records and research we realised a bunch of corrupt inept bureaucrats have more than likely been the source as they have squandered billions and with a few name changes over the past 10 years, very few people (except the insiders) are aware of their existence let alone their corrupt history.
We published this about 18 months ago and hope it will be of some interest, particularly to SME’s as they are consistently being used by a wide range of bureaucracies to milk budgets and essentially maintain their corrupt squandering empires.
Once again our ongoing research has identified their ignorance about these new technologies, their economics and flawed bureaucracies, so there is no surprise they would produce a report to protect themselves and their trough – feeding careers.
We would always like to hear from any SME’s interested in long-term solutions. But we must emphasise what we publish here is the tip of the iceberg and if SME’s want to continue to ignore this wasted wealth and lost opportunity we can only do so much without some support. (We apologise for the quality but we have limited resources while these parasites squander billions and opportunities to benefit SME’s continue to be ignored.) If the AWB corruption is not enough for SME’s to realize the extent of what corrupt bureaucracy is costing them then we are at a loss.

E-BUSINESS PROGRAMS-Government wastes A$140 million plus while enterprise stifled ?... 2004/2005
When any in-group remotely connected to government wants to get funds it seems all they need to do is promote some sort of solution for SME's, which in turn can be promoted by the government of the day.
This has been popular for about two decades now but a closer look shows it is probably being abused with a dubious return on investment. Of course the politicians and bureaucrats are not going to fall over themselves looking for reasons to expose the flaws and the media monopoly true to form will only raise the issue if compelled to but without joining the dots. The politicians because it's good PR to promote their concern about SME's; The bureaucrats because it's a good job where not even the pols know much about it; And the media monopoly because it contributes to profits by way of government advertising spending and quick (free) press releases good for filling otherwise blank space. And of course, because of the bigger issue, which is that they want to remain a media monopoly.
What NOIE was up until recently, and its subsequent reinvention, is a good example of the model.The National Office for the Information Economy was created in 1997 to provide, “thought leadership to SME's and to help make Australian SME's more competitive and profitable by working to optimise their ability to participate in, and benefit from, the information economy.”
This is a worthy aim but it is clear it was never the first priority. Getting a budget and spending it was, and still is!
Before being axed in 2004 (with a convenient name change from NOIE to AGIMO so they could keep the show going) NOIE employed 170 bureaucrats directly. Logically if it was achieving the stated aim then it would be expected to still be around not need a name change and a new mission. It is more or less but broken up, renamed and recycled and merged into other bureaucracies now called AGIMO although in the past 18 months it could be renamed again. (Destroy the history and no one will follow it. Like the AWB model we are getting a view of now in March 2006.) All of the bureaucrats survived and importantly so did the budget as other creative schemes were devised to make sure it is spent, and they spend it. If any of the bureaucrats left their government positions they would have moved on into one of the many consulatncies they threw millions at to pave their dual career paths etc. The public sector union made some noise about closing it down but their only priority was preventing any loss of jobs not SME's. Of course there is always the distinct possibility that if this kind of money was invested in new industry creation it could not only create a greater number of jobs for the long-term, but also export earnings. One eBay equivalent or even a modest sucessful variation, would be more valuable in every respect. However given history it seems such a success might up the benchmark for government, which would result in unwelcome exposure of the traditional poor track record and return on investment. Again, whether it achieves the stated aims for SME's and the nation into the long-term is not the priority. Although we would like to hear from any SME's who feel they have benefited, and how. We would like to be proven wrong. This seems to be yet another case of the left hand conveniently not knowing what the right hand is doing. Some familiar patterns appear! Not leaving a trail always seems to be a priority. Why was it necessary to erase the name and break up – but not break up- the organisation? And so on.
Another spin-off occurred in 1997 called AUSe.NET (Australian Electronic Business Network) as, and according to the PR, “an industry led initiative, established in partnership with governments across Australia to foster awareness of e-commerce among Australian SME's.” It was funded and promoted as providing workshops to SME's about e-commerce, but at $150 plus per SME. However there do not seem to be any financial reports about this entity and how much revenue it generated and where this revenue in turn was spent. More bureaucracy would be the obvious guess! ASIC might be able to provide financial reports?
Again if any SME's have any relevant information about AUSe.NET please send it along. Information about any other government “initiatives” including at the state government level would also be useful.
It would be a shame to have accumulated all of this expensive new –technology experience and not to use it, but to bury it, and perhaps instead to repeat history. And also when there are in fact valuable and unique short to long – term online opportunities available for SME's. But are unable to find sufficient funding! This is a common pattern over more than the past 2 decades and goes some way to explain why Australia has such a well known track record of missing the boat. It seems bureaucracy that has a track record of failing, including identifying an ROI, is worth continually funding as the highest priority. It also does mean though, that government budgets will be spent regardless of the results.
Every large bureaucracy, government or private - and often these days they are for many purposes, as one – knows that the way it conducts its affairs is the best way and more often than not, if they want first bite at the budget, the only way. This culture, however, cannot hope to optimise benefits from the information economy for SME's. Government bureaucrats might be just as perceptive as private entrepreneurs, but there is no mechanism for terminating unsuccessful experiments; instead they tend to be expanded in order to bury small failures in a large venture which itself will one day fail. (NOIE as a modest example has been funded around A$50 million a year, which in context is small.)
Businesses that are operated in accordance with the law of bureaucratic inertia fail. Eventually if this inertia becomes dominant over a long enough period, perhaps an economy will develop a growing world record foreign debt and a currency exchange rate that tests US$0.48 cents more than once and on a regular basis. Valuable for foreign exchange speculators!Another government scheme (of many) that has been funded over the same time –frame is, Building on IT Strengths, or BITS. As an incubator program it is fundamentally flawed. Not for the network of public and private bureaucrats though! Of the original budget of A$78 million 60 % has been spent for management fees and advise. Optimising benefits to SME's indeed! The BITS model the government has funded was known to be sub-optimal from the start. Just 31 per cent of funding went to start-up companies.
Again a familiar pattern but also, however, there are many familiar names and faces among the public and private bureaucrats tasked with managing the funds.Successive governments have a history of this kind of inefficient “industry initiative”. Like some vast computer, penetrated by error and duplicating it forever!
Identifying an ROI is proving to be a convenient moving target depending on how much governments spend on getting consultants to find one. That Australia 's ICT deficit has climbed to around $60 billion from about $2 billion 20 years ago seems not to be given much weight. This might also indicate how sure they are that they will be able to continue to “duplicate it forever”.The Annual report for NOIE shows some interesting priorities in light of the claim to be their for advancing the information economy status of SME's.Overall expenses for Years 2002 and 2003 were $30 million and $50 million. The surplus in 2002 of $5.3 million of course had to be disposed of somehow and in 2003 it was with a deficit of $4.6 million. Grants to optimise benefits to SME's were $1.27 million in 2002 and $3.0 million in 2003! Ranging from 3 to 6 percent of their overall budget! NOIE required 170 employees to administer and manage this optimisation for SME's! And consumed close to the same amount for each year! That is, $15 million or around 50 percent in 2002 and 30 % in 2003 of their budget.Suppliers (consultants?) consumed the largest percentage in 2003. And so on.
Clearly SME's haven't been the priority although again they continue to be used as the vehicle to get a bureaucracy funded and setup. Perhaps this is also another inspired job creation scheme! It is doubtful it could be said to be industry and wealth creation. After NOIE was axed in 2004 some new schemes were devised and administered and managed out of other offices under other names. One of these is now referred to as a Demand Aggregation scheme, which is allocating over $8 million to regional bureaucracies for the purpose of supposedly facilitating the cost-effective adoption of broadband networks.(While government controlled Telstra, with enormously expensive installed unlit fibre, impedes universal broadband adoption to ensure it can maintain its profits and the Telstra share-price! And thus a higher price for a T3 sale, after which will occur unprecedented uncertainty! Add this to the cost of giving broadcasters free digital spectrum, plus the cost of T2, among various other costs, and it should raise questions about the overall long - term cost to the economy of the governments consistent support of the media status quo. A form of open ended subsidy by SME's perhaps? ) However once again it is sub-optimal, as SME's have, overall, some unique demand aggregation opportunities that would produce a ROI in excess of anything this scheme claims to deliver. But yet again such opportunities are not originated by the bureaucracies tasked to spend these budgets. Therefore how could they be worth funding! The first round of funding for this scheme has been disposed of and another round is being prepared for funding.
It is interesting to make some comparisons with one or more Internet companies started in the US and Australia over similar timeframes. The company eBay for example was started in 1996/97 and with initial funding of around $20 million achieved revenues of $2.0 billion and a market capitalization of $ 65 billion in 2004. About the same time Looksmart Ltd. started life in Melbourne with government backing, climbed to around a market value of A$2 billion, with a current market value of $250 million. The government shareholding was sold at the peak, producing a "return" (or rather a transfer!) to government of about $200 million. A variation of T2, which is wealth transfer not wealth creation. Many other such examples exist.
In the last analysis, and if history is any guide, it is clear that if SME's want to optimise their short to long-term information economy benefits they should not be relying on government.
NICE TRY COONAN AND CO BUT SOME OF THE HISTORY SURVIVES.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Keep a Bureaucrat Employed
Australia’s Gold Medal Suicide Tally
Part Of Australia’s Homegrown and Necessary Slice of 3rd World
Support The System That Supports You


During the Howard coalition governments tenure Australia’s suicide rate has broken all previous records and over the past 5 years has reached 12,312. This is a remarkable achievement by any measure and deserves to be recognised worldwide as such. That it isn’t more widely known is probably because Australian governments have the reliable profiteering Australian media monopoly to protect them against closer scrutiny on this and some well deserved exposure. And many other issues of course, we are attempting at last to remedy to some extent given limited resources, which successive squandering governments can be grateful for. During the labor party mafia’s tenure from 1982 through to 1996 their national suicide tally was half this or less over comparable time frames.
But the popularity of Howard and his coalition government correlates nicely with this gold medal result. To the extent they have voters giving them unprecedented control of federal parliament. This could be interpreted as the Australian people rewarding political parties that have such gold medal credentials and contributing to weeding out the herd. And with the National Party farmers such a wonderful component of the coalition, culling could be being pushed as desirable for national security and so on.
And the future of Australia as a nation and so on according to Howard.
Some families have even sacrificed 2 of their offspring and this is apparently happening on a more frequent basis.Of course the academics and bureaucrats in true ozzy style have latched onto this gold medal performance as a source of funding and careers. Once again, with their infinite capacity to spin off all kinds of useful solutions. Getting a budget and an empire going for example. A think tank perhaps? (They got A$40 million for a Bureaucracy For Depresssion!) That only and typically thinks selectively for purposes of producing more propaganda! And we know what that means in Australia. (If not see some of previous.) Anything to dissipate budgets to keep and grow empires and so bureaucracy expands as does the stupidity and waste. And corruption, its cover-up and more propaganda!
Although the blackout includes government data, it is probably the case that the victims are mainly vulnerable already and supporting a string of bureaucracies as solutions meant to prevent it. We hope to discover this eventually, like many of the gems the treasure chest of government data contains that is collected at the public’s expense but restricted from the public domain. Democracy indeed!
Another gold medal tally that should make all Ozzies proud, in true cop-out fashion. How about a word from the sponsor! Via free to air analog TV of course.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Bureaucracy as a Social Problem!
Australia’s Mandarin Mafia
Nation Builders or National Problem?

Since about 1975 federal government revenue collection has gone from A$15 billion a year to over A$200 billion now. Bureaucracy and government empires have grown steadily without stopping every year for 30 plus years and the trough feeders have increased in numbers and demands on the public purse. It’s too bad they do not put anything back in! While this was going on Australian government was pouring more and more into Industry Assistance and public funded R & D and so forth. Universities increased in number from about 10 to over 30 now. During the same time frame the nations foreign debt went from a modest harmless A$50 billion or less to over A$650 billion now.
Their latest contribution to nation building is the renewed ongoing stifling of interactive digital TV. They, as typical Australian government knows best bureaucrats and politicians, squandered the past 10 years of unprecedented opportunity in all things digital. Naturally they are not going to explain how much of a stuff - up they have made of it. And in fact as usual will spruik their initiatives and leadership instead. (Over the media monopoly assets of course.)
However the economic data exists to expose them as being the inept failures they are. But the one stable constant Australia’s bureaucrats have is their ability to live off and prosper off instability.
They have essentially stifled the natural evolution of digital technology across Australia through impeding the application of technological advances in broadband to protect their media mates and Telstra and this is and will have increasing economic impact on the nation now and in the future.
For example it is estimated the value at stake of optimal development of digital technologies is considerable and research has shown that closing the productivity gaps between current and best practice could raise GNP by an astonishing 300 percent. These gaps are significantly influenced by management practices, but given the dominant counterproductive (and corrupt) role bureaucracy has across too many aspects of Australia’s economy it is also clear that these gains can be undermined and destroyed by the stupid policy, ignorant gutless politicians and their sycophantic dual career path bureaucrats are continually dictating. Too many shifty bureaucrats with too many profligate empires is a formula for what Australia has. And increasingly doesn’t have!
The latest is digital TV! The fact is that if Australia wants these available economic gains and benefits then broadband must be maximized. Simple! But that means analog TV and the media oligarchs and their media monopoly, including corrupt Telstra, would be subject to the immediate threat from infinite bandwidth. Something Howard, Coonan and the rest of the propaganda peddlers are either unaware of or are aware but choose to bury it to satisfy their own agenda, which includes continuing to protect the media monopoly and their power as the political status quo. Therefore they must prevent broadband but convey the impression through propaganda, again, that they are delivering DTV for example to the majority. But that’s all it is, PROPAGANDA!
Broadband would also be of more value to the economy than IR reform. It would also be of greater value if all analog and digital broadband infrastructure was auctioned off and the proceeds used to get rid of the media oligarchs and their inefficient narrowband thinly disguised as an analog form of wide band.
The A$10 billion plus Telstra shareholders have lost since the governments T2 scam (with their investment banker mates who also used their cut to donate to the coalition to keep the show going) would have been enough to do the job and led to a world class free digital infrastructure, including iDTV (and a 4th network). But no these ignorant hypocritical (Australian lawyers as politicians spruiking free market forces is an oxymoron) political transients and their infrastructure of nameless faceless corrupt protected bureaucrats persist in playing games where they believe they have a birth right passed on from generation to generation to dictate what the majority should have, despite their track record over decades of ineptitude and waste but continuing empire building.
Once again it is clear we need an Economic Bill of Rights. The sooner the better!

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Coonan’s Media Plans No Plans…

Media Mafia Maintains Status Quo…
ACCC Cops-Out…

Also see http://4idtvforum.blogspot

One of things they all have in common of course is Australian lawyers whether as politicians, regulators or economic impediments to nation building.
Coonan got the media baton from Alston and will now be looking for someone to pass it to as she prepares for her retirement from politics and a gravy train payoff like Alston. Meanwhile Australia slips further and faster behind in the once wonderful leading opportunity to develop and build a world leading interactive DTV platform, free and profitably deliverable to all Australians.
Australians should also understand that this media mafia is not going to use their media assets to explain what it is Australians have lost. You won’t for example get fully informed through any of the analog TV mafia broadcasters like C9, C7, C10 and their regional networks, WIN TV and Prime.(It is in fact a unique narrowcast as it so limits what Australians are fed as any propaganda machine would.) This mafia and their assets remain continually protected by the government of the day. In the past in was the labor party mafia now it happens to be Howard’s coalition. (And you thought the wheat mafia and their corruption was the only thing the government is protecting from exposure. Full exposure is now the Cole cover-up.)
The print media is part of the media mafia and also will not be using their print assets to fully inform Australians about what they are losing or probably after 10 years have already lost.
Coonan and Howard are running a media mafia orchestrated propaganda line and the majority of Australians will be effectively bamboozled by it.
The government with your billions on tap and the entrenched profiteering media mafia are a formidable wall of propaganda you are not expected to be able to individually challenge.
However there is a way.
Firstly every Australian should by now be demanding a 4th national digital TV network. In a democracy there are ways to make this happen, including voting for those who will deliver it, but if apathy prevails it will not happen and the media mafia and the government therefore will do anything and everything possible to attempt to insure Australians remain less than fully informed about the subject and apathetic about the delivery of a 4th network.
Secondly an Economic Bill of Rights that would amend the Australian Constitution is an imperative if Australia wants to maximize benefits now and for the future in this regard.
A democracy allows both of these imperatives to happen. If the citizens can manage to get more and better informed about both. The media mafia and the political status quo will prevent the majority from achieving one or both if possible. It’s in their vested interest to do so. One for power and its perpetuation under their control. The other for profit. They have a mutually beneficial alliance to do so.

We would like to hear from anyone wanting more information about both subjects and their imperatives.
Two years ago Coonan was in the Finance portfolio spruiking over the media about her knowledge and expertise in all things financial to consumers. She is now an expert about digital technologies and their economics. She knows little about either except what a network of sycophantic dual career path corrupt bureaucrats and media mafia lobby trolls and representatives feed her.
The latest media coverage about the government’s plans for the media mafia (them) can never be objective. They are too corrupted from decades of highly profitable deviant government support to be able to assess and report on the optimal public interest benefits of these new digital technologies and their economic benefits.Remember they are owners of old legacy assets that they must protect at any cost, especially from the digital threat. And they have reliably been aligned with the political status quo for decades. This is not about you and maximising public interest benefits. It is about the tyranny of the status quo.
It’s your choice. Use it or lose it!
It is now or never for 4iDTV and Australia’s unique hardware and software digital opportunity now and into the future.
Are you going to leave it all up to the status quo and a bunch of self-serving transient mealy-mouthed ignorant politicians and their nameless faceless mandarins?

Monday, March 13, 2006

Australia’s Politicians and Bureaucrats Sell-Out Local ICT

Howard – Coonan Still Working For The Media Mafia

Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats continue to bury the local information technology industry mainly by contracting more and more government and related ICT to offshore outsourcing centres through convenient intermediaries like Accenture ( previously Arthur Anderson and responsible for Enron USA corruption and bankruptcy), Deloitte, IBM and others. The politicians don’t know a thing about technology or the economics, and take their queue from the mandarins who in turn get their direction from these same multinationals and in the process the mandarins get a dual career path paved as a payoff for when they leave government.
Now after almost 10 years the ignorant but media mafia-loyal politicians and their flunkeys the bureaucrats, are still stifling Australia’s gradually receding unique opportunity to take a world leading position in building and delivering free interactive digital TV to all Australians.
As expected Howard and Coonan (both ozzy lawyers) have maintained the same DTV status Howard’s previous communications minister Alston handed the media oligarchs almost 10 years ago. This is what they want you to believe is in the public interest, but is not and in fact is in the governments interest and the media monopoly’s interest.
They have now conveniently protected the media status quo by extending the analog transmission switch-off date another 5 or more years and also maintained preventing a 4th national network. Did you vote for these morons?
This is nothing less than outrageous and is costing Australia and all Australians enormously. It is an opportunity unprecedented in Australia’s history and a bunch of ignorant arrogant mealy-mouthed politicians and their loyal sycophantic mandarins continue to claim to know best for the majority.
We have explained elsewhere on this blog how and why this status persists. A propaganda machine!
Once again an Economic Bill of Rights is the best way to get a 4th network and free digital TV for all Australians and prune corrupt inept spineless government. Unless you like funding the entrenched media mafia and their government granted license to print money, while you get more and more analog rubbish pumped out to you through the economically inefficient use of public spectrum.
You have the choice but the political and media status quo do not want you fully informed about just what the choice is. Naturally and in alliance with the government of the day they want you kept in the dark and about the long-term economic cost to you and the nation.
Wake up, this unique opportunity is being slowly but surely lost. And it is rapidly converging into the same issue as the local ICT industry being lost to offshore outsourcing.
If you want more information and would like to pursue your 4th network please contact us as we are increasingly concerned about the economic consequences if the status quo persists with this policy they have rigged for themselves and the media mafia.
Have you noticed how there is so little law being made and changed about this issue, when compared with their enthusiasm for changing tax and IR laws and so forth?
Help us expose the tyranny of the status quo in this regard and maximize the economic benefits from a 4th iDTV network before it is lost completely while the media mafia gets handed complete control and or ownership of it but in their time frame, which is not now as their past 10 year effort to stifle the digital threat has proven.
Banana republic Howard and Coonan have now given them another 5 to 10 years of extra time. And if they need more the political status quo will be ready to give them more.
ALL AT YOUR EXPENSE! Again!

Australian Bureaucracy, Pork Barrelling and More Corruption!

This Is 1998 So What’s New In 2006? It’s The Culture!

Is Your Business Competitor Getting Secret State and/or Federal Government Funding?

The labor party has a history of corruption but given the large sums spent on state industry assistance year in and year out and the fact NSW has consistently remained the poorest performing economy over decades and is also not a diversified economy although there seems to be no limit to what bureaucracy can cook up to survive and dissipate budgets. (But notice NSW is at the top of the list at $316 per head, which is an interesting correlation, like so many the labor party mafia at local, state and federal have produced over decades to the extent one would have thought such a blatant devious waste of money might have attracted the odd Phd candidate. Nada!). Maybe the liberal party opposition at least, given their steady PR concern about the people of NSW, could raise a squeak about the return on investment value. Nada! But as all opposition parties are consistently silent about this SRD waste and corruption despite the research proving it, it seems there is really no opposition, unless they all happen to be ignorant of SRD, or perhaps simply too gutless to do what they are elected for. An opposition that is in fact no opposition. So why are they in parliament? For the cruise of course! Although it seems the state coalition has not realised they need to get hold of an equivalent slush fund to be able to get into power (unlikely under the circumstances), or eliminate the slush fund altogether. Nothing like choice but only if used. This would solve many problems and level the political playing field not only for them but other parties as the labor party mafia would no longer have its slush fund nor any party. And in the process because the army of public and private bureaucrats also living off this $316 plus per head exist because they are, according to their PR, so remarkably clever at picking winners, they could go to town at their own expense (no doubt the banks and others would be queing up to fund such astute enterprise and entrepreneurship) and create a large number of new businesses with new jobs, exports and wealth. The $316 plus per head could be returned to the citizen stakeholders who could then decide whether they wanted to consume or reinvest in nation building (and not corrupt bureaucrats and theri perpetuation), and with these astute ex bureaucrats and so on. Enterprise! The benefits are obvious: Fewer public and private bureaucrats and their increasing corruption; all political parties equal in terms of no unaccountable secretive slush fund thereby leading to a more healthy democracy; a positive ROI instead of a negative sum game outcome; SME's not undermining other SME's; And so on. Or maybe they all believe they are a lot sharper than say a bunch of economists in the Industry/Productivity Commission (who never go as far as they could so in effect they have from self interest corrupted the profession and the commission), and the odd Nobel Laureate (no ozzies sorry but maybe now you know why). Basically the network of public and private bureaucrats are now so entrenched around this industry assistance trough no politician has the guts to expose it let alone challenge the value for money. But it is clear the other parties would have a better chance of achieving government and in the process contributing to nation building and perhaps a 5% plus economic growth from all of the enterprise instead of 2.5% if you're lucky. Productivity and efficiency indeed! Or perhaps the status quo as it exists simply resists change to the bitter end. Argentina is a recent example of what happens. Curious also how none of the academics at 38 universities across Australia will touch the subject. We are aware of how this wasteful and corrupt system works and will be publishing descriptions with analysis in due course ( if you want it in a hurry or would like to contribute please email).Some journalists employed by the media monopoly have made various attempts over about a decade to expose the show but they risk any sort of career prospects if they take it too far. That is take it to where any democracy should take it. The media monopoly oligarchs however won't tolerate upsetting the poltical status quo (profits and asset protection etc ) and so they cover it according to their version of diversity of opinion, which is of course not diversity of opinion.Both the labor party and the coalition at state and federal level are as equally protective of this massive pork barrelling trough and allow it to continue for obvious reasons. And Evans wheazing about a "direct and flagrant breach" is typical labor party hypocrisy. Evans is now ensconced in Paris living off the proceeds.It's because of the kickback opportunities to party coffers and politicising and compromising SME's and businesses across the state that the political status quo keeps industry assistance going. The bureaucrats have devised all manner of typically devious ways to prevent the public getting information about who the beneficiaries are and so on. From dubious claims to confidentiality, Privacy laws, competition and competitive neutrality and so on. Truly banana republic stuff. Of course and as usual, with this kind of money the bureaucracy is a mafia and will resort to anything to keep control of the trough. Why not when they have succeeded so well for 20 years or more and with party support. They both do well out of it. And again of course if the state is performing poorly economically then that means there is always unemployment and this means Centrelink and other bureaucracies can continue to live off the many spinoffs, including crime and so on where more prisons can be justified, (and the media oligarchs can use them for TV shows and the pols and bureaucrats can get more propaganda mileage and so on),more police and so on in a virtuous circle of bureaucracy. ...Meanwhile bureaucracy, safely repeating today what it did yesterday, rolls on as ineluctably as some vast computer , which once penetrated by error, duplicates it forever.”...As for "undermining public faith...", well first the public have to know about it and with the media oligarchs in your pocket and their content producers and their careers in your cross-hairs, the public gets the usual now familiar mushroom treatment.

Friday, March 10, 2006


Howards Cronulla Contribution – Government Propaganda Backfires?

Who Benefits?

As the Ozzy media status quo goes through the usual politically convenient exercise to get to the source of the Cronulla rampage, they yet again expose themselves as being programmed to avoid identifying and exposing government as the cause. Don’t bite the hand that feeds, just convey the impression.
Howard is the trigger and it should be obvious. How so ?
It isn’t difficult but it clearly is for the media status quo as decades of being the profiteering propaganda machine for successive governments has defined their concept of what an open media encouraging diversity of opinion means. Australian’s over decades of this media monopoly have become programmed to accept their narrow view and version of the world, now believing it is the best that can be achieved in a free and democratic society. Such is the power of propaganda!
Howard and his coalition sycophants have spent a number of years, especially since 9/11 constantly and relentlessly attacking the Mid - East and of course people of Mid - East appearance, for obvious reasons. Eventually this self - serving and orchestrated propaganda is going to do what propaganda and brainwashing are designed to do. In this case to eventually confirm to the Anglo-European Ozzy that it will be acceptable to turn on the source of much of what Howard and his cabinet (of Ozzy lawyers) view, for political expediency, as the scourge of everything these cunning cocooned political manipulators convey as being worthy of being called civilization.
It clearly shows how racist elements in the community are prepared to take advantage of such situations to further their own interests. Particularly politicians and bureaucrats. Naturally enough as anyone in advertising and marketing would know (and employed by all of the political status quo at your expense) the message will sink in and in this case it has with the added benefit the politicians and bureaucrats at many levels, including state, can use the results to justify bigger empires, bigger budgets and greater control over society. (For example they have by now lost just about all credibility on their expensive, boof-head war on drugs and needed a new reason to justify bigger budgets and empire building. Communism more or less is attempting to adopt variations of capitalism and so on. Thanks for saving my career and empire al-Qaeda! Numero uno bogey – man!)

The detonator as it were has been the new laws to fight terrorism. There was a long drawn out subtle but relentless government PR campaign and build up to this event and when finalized there was the appropriate additional government propaganda to attempt to prove how necessary they were. (Don’t worry folks we want you to get your moneys worth). Of course terrorism as it is now understood through media manipulation, has been a boon for governments and many bureaucrats must be secretly grateful it happened along to give them an open cheque book on expanding their empires and increasing their budgets. They are now in full flight and anything goes. It is an unprecedented opportunity for the political status quo and the gravy train of bureaucrats (the insidious new class) and their empires to gain even more control over the masses and no opportunity is being ignored. They now see it as a unique opportunity for an ID card, biometric passports and other such documents, compulsory or nearly so, psychometric testing, and more.Howard has proven time and time again that he is either a pathological liar or deviously cunning in his manipulation of and contempt for the Australian people.

The Cronulla clashes occurred because of Howard and his relentless self - serving propaganda. And it should be acknowledged. This is your leader! To divert the publics attention from identifying this he and his coalition cowards then immediately scapegoated anything and everything in sight including the state labor party mafia over deliberately manipulating resources to the eastern suburbs areas, which happens to be the coalitions electorate.
Then to quickly use the free to air TV propaganda machine in typical style and enthusiasm and claim oz is not a racist country. This is what the result is after decades ensconced and encased in the political cocoon that is the political status quo. Anything Howard knows about the Australian people he gets fed to him through layers of sycophants with dual career paths their priority.
As they say in the USA, and in this regard, he probably wouldn’t know his arsehole from a hole in the ground. But that he persists probably says more about Australians. And of course voting for the labor party mafia as a solution would be rewarding them for Howard’s and the coalitions prevailing status. Clever country indeed!

Remember the laws bureaucracy lives by: never under any circumstances give back one dollar of any budget once achieved; and do anything and everything possible to increase that budget. The empires must grow at any cost. Even at the cost of democracy and free speech!

Thursday, March 09, 2006

The Centrelink Mafia

More Corrupt Australian Bureaucracy At Work

Centrelink and their extensive secretive and unaccountable network of public and private bureaucracies need a large percentage of society dependent on them. This ensures they can maintain their corrupt empire and grow their multibillion dollar budgets. And they are at it again in 2006 as they advertise to their network of corrupt mates to “tender” for contracts for their version of a jobs network solution. Created by bureaucrats for bureaucrats.The Jobs Networks (JN), NEIS, CWC, DOES, PSP,JPET and anything else that will keep their corrupt public and private empires like Centrelink going and their budgets spent has also contributed to undermining entrepreneurship and an export culture.Australians need some answers (but first they need to know what question to ask) about why Centrelink is getting bigger and its budgets are growing when unemployment according to government, has declined from 15% to 5%. If there are fewer unemployed then why does this vast corrupt network of public and private bureaucracy need to be the same size (or larger) as when unemployment was at 15%?They do not want full employment! The bureaucrats would lose their network and Centrelink empire and they would all need to get real jobs instead of being typical little Hitler’s living off fellow Australian’s. Howard would rather keep propping them up and their corrupt Jobs Network mates with billions than use the money for new industry, new job and new wealth creation. It is now an industry and given ozzy bureaucracy probably can’t be dismantled. So the show continues. They prefer a growing A$600 billion foreign debt than reducing it. Anything to keep the empires intact and now they reckon they deserve their very own slush fund trough - The Future Fund – funded by the majority but unbeknownst to them. Obviously given their handiwork over decades they believe they deserve it.Howard’s coalition crusaders have also found innovative ways to transfer public wealth to religious organizations who are more than happy (given history no surprise and keeping up the crusaders tradition – loot, pillage etc…) to profiteer off this critical mass of 5% (?) to 15% (?) fodder.
Recently the Salvation Army Plus Job Network agency was partly exposed up to its humanitarian eyeballs in corruption as it engaged in illegal activities to divert over A$10 million from government. They repaid the A$9 million and are still in the jobs network. (Rewarding the crimes! Is it any wonder then AWB and the rest of ozzy bureaucracy is so inspired? The trough feeders!) This is equivalent to bank robbers handing their gains back after getting caught. Or, like the few individuals caught by Centrelink cheating the government for a few thousand dollars. Invariably they get convicted and often jail time. Another one of Howard’s religious mates Hillsong also got caught with its snout in the trough. And so on and on it goes. Howard’s old mate runs the Salvation Army!Australia it seems is now governed by a cadre the equivalent of the three wise monkeys!What do Centrelink, Australian Wheat Board, Austrade, Ausindustry, Jobs Network, NEIS, DFAT and a string of state and federal bureaucracies have in common? An entrenched insidious corrupt network of zealous bureaucrats and ex – bureaucrats! Underwriting their interests using vast taxpayer resources through a confusing complex array of schemes and programs, reinvented and recycled for the purpose.They are capable of creating any kind of so-called solutions to keep their budgets spent and to protect their jobs! Every week this network of public and private bureaucrats dream up something new to keep their vulnerable victims running around wasting time, money and energy to generate statistics for these counterproductive bureaucrats. An old-boys and old-girls network of bureaucrats and ex-bureaucrats.As the Cole commission is reluctantly exposing, Australia’s bureaucrats are a mafia and the whole bureaucracy should be exposed through a royal commission. Then what? Smaller and less expensive government of course!This network is underwriting their own extensive business interests and dual career paths using these billions and Australia’s elected representatives ignore it by constantly promoting skills shortages and other diversions including scapegoating the victims. Despite age discrimination laws discrimination is rampant across Australia and Howard (and Beazley and co) is in convenient denial. They would rather waste billions on useless counterproductive bureaucrats than use funds to create new industry, new jobs and new wealth. No surprises therefore the foreign debt keeps building.The bureaucrats have devised a range of clever statistics generating "solutions" to provide data that ABS ( Australian Bureau of Statistics ) uses to claim unemployment has never been healthier, which the politicians quickly use to crow about. The RBA governor claims at 5 % its as good as it can ever be (what else could he say? Although would anyone trust the opinion of an ozzy mandarin these days? Unfortunately it seems so.) Meanwhile a local academic – a rare example – suggests that unemployment is in fact over 10 %. Which would explain why the Centrelink mafia is still a growing empire with a growing budget. And also reduce the RBA governors version of the state of affairs to the humbug it is. Interestingly these two views were published on the same day in the same Fairfax Media newspaper, the Australian Financial Review, and apparently the content producers are not abale to join the dots in a basic attempt to explain the conflict. But of course this is not what ozzy content producers do, if they want to get a career and protect it. Conform to get in and conform to remain in. Anyone concerned about the nazi holocaust equivalent occurring again should wake up to the fact the same culture prevails in 2006. Perhaps it should be acknowledged as a fundamental flaw in human nature as a survival instinct, which means of course and inevitably such horrors will occur again and in fact have been in one form or another over the past 50 years. It seems governments anywhere are capable of anything to protect empires and the tyranny of the status quo, to repeat history and never to admit to having erred. The formula?Australian’s seem to have been so succesfully brainwashed over decades they believe they have a world class media that keeps them fully informed, which is probably certain proof of how efficient the brainwashing is.Massively inefficient (and corrupt) Australian governments now claim 50 cents of everyone’s dollar and this is an increase from 15 cents about 30 years ago. Or, from about A$20 billion in federal government revenue to over A$200 billion per year today. Given such a rate of growth and the dominance of Australian bureaucracy over every aspect of Australia’s democracy, where is it likely to end up in another 30 years? Seventy five cents in the dollar!?And given the laws that drive Australian bureaucracy to what extent is democracy itself threatened?(Howard’s little Hitler’s are using anything and everything to ensure they get every citizen with a national smart ID card, which is another example of the measures bureaucracy will take to justify growing empires and budgets.)Never under any circumstances give back one dollar of any budget once achieved; and do anything and everything possible to increase that budget. The empires must grow at any cost.The solution is not so difficult, the execution however presents a challenge.

Why Have Australia’s Governments Become So Corrupt And Inefficient?

Why Have Australians Handed Their Democracy Over To This New Class Of Bureaucrats And Lawyers?

The answer is not complicated, however such a state of the nation means that there are consequences such as the need for the political status quo to become more deeply involved with the Australian media monopoly oligarchs ( behind closed doors naturally) for the purposes of increased propaganda. As the tyranny of the status quo is increasingly exposed as in the AWB case - but not unique by any means- there is a need for more propaganda to make the majority believe they are being fully informed when in fact they are being cleverly bamboozled and confused to the extent apathy will mean eventually the majority will lose interest because it is getting too complex and confusing. Another status quo success!

The two main laws that drive Australian bureaucracy:
never under any circumstances give back one dollar of any budget once achieved; and do anything and everything possible to increase that budget. Their empires must grow at any cost.

As their take has grown from 15 cents to 50 cents of everyone’s dollar they will do anything to blow their budgets to insure they keep growing them.
So where do you think it will stop in another 30 years, at 85 cents in the dollar?Another easy answer! When they are in complete control of you, directly and indirectly and 100% of your dollar? It is being setup at this moment as a continuation of their plans over the past 30 – 40 years. Their latest is the Future Fund which is billions of dollars of your money put into a fund controlled by corrupt Australian bureaucracy and the political status quo that benefits from such corruption and that protects the bureaucrats, and that is going to be used to pay their pensions forever. Did you vote for this? Did you give these counterproductive elitist parasites a mandate for this? The AWB corruption and the complex web of participants is only the tip of the ice-burg but will be about all the majority of Australians will get to see.
Apart from the problem that exists as bureaucracy makes every cunning effort to protect budgets and empires, the political status quo in the form of the two main parties has developed a deeply entrenched relationship over many deacdes, with the vast networks of public and private bureaucracy that helps to fund their power and control over the majority and prevents any new party getting a start. This means the bureaucracy does not want to alter this status quo alliance as they fear their status, budgets and empires would be vulnerable.
Again an Economic Bill of Rights will empower Australians to get rid of the excess of government. However many of these gravy train parasites and their networks will resist something as threatening as an Economic Bill of Rights. They are prepared to resort to any means (at your expense of course) to stifle such an initiative and prevent it becoming a constitutional reality. They prefer the TYRANNY OF THE STATUS QUO. It has served them well for decades.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Your Free Digital TV Still Being Denied

Why Are You Being Kept In The Dark About Free Digital TV? Australia's Media Monopoly Oligarchs And Their Government Mates Are Making Certain the Status Quo Prevails But At Your Expense As They Clip Coupons In Tax Havens

Since at least about 1992 there has been a war going on between a handful of media owners and the public (you), through your elected representatives, over the future of broadcast and print media ownership and laws. As it turns out however they are in an alliance and together they have successfully denied the public what they own and are entitled to have. Free digital TV! As the Australian media is essentially a deeply entrenched vested interest monopoly most Australian's have been for most purposes unaware of this life and death struggle and its significance and relevance to them. This can be achieved relatively easily because the media status quo controls all the main influential sources of information distribution. This is what they call diversity? The most dominant distribution system is broadcast TV. The broadcast monopoly covers 100 % of the Australian public and it should not come as a surprise they have been using these assets to manipulate public opinion for decades. (Especially on behalf of governments, which is very profitable in more ways than one). And particularly since 1998 when new laws were passed (after being designed by the media monopoly, with the political status quo and bureaucrats, and therefore to maximise protection for them at the publics expense), that would supposedly give all Australians world-class digital television and content. (Government needs the media to promote their "initiatives" in this respect). When this law was produced the broadcast oligarchs made sure they received extra spectrum for channels that they insisted were needed to allow them to convert to digital for the publics benefits. (Not the case.) They also made sure they received this public asset without charge and with very few strings attached. Digital entertainment was supposed to be available in January 2001. This has not happened. But the governments continuing cooperation to support this old media monopoly is blatantly also meant to protect their interests. By continually accommodating the media status quo they can protect themselves from bad publicity and are able to use the narrowly owned media for political purposes as they have done for decades. That is for propaganda. The media oligarchs get a license to print money and the government gets a propaganda tool. But the Australian public has and continues to pay an enormous price for this convenient relationship.The value of these extra channels is estimated to be worth in excess of A$3 billion in an open auction. This is worth much more now but the government has never undertaken a valuation. The media monopoly very likely has but of course will never make it public.( It is not as difficult as they make it out to be, which is really meant to get rid of you. And given government is dominated by lawyers it is curious yet again, and consistently, how logic selectively disappears when needed most).There was no reason then and now for the broadcasters to receive this valuable public asset free of charge. There were then and now spectrum allocation alternatives that should be maximised efficiently and in value through an international auction process. The media monopoly avoids this subject completely and the government continues to waffle about prioritising giving the Australian people the best digital system in the world. Yet again what else are they going to say?Prior to 1998 and for a few years afterwards the print media oligopoly (more like a monopoly though) managed to get a view out into the public through their print media assets (in fact for purposes of manipulating public opinion), that this digital TV law was unfair to them and the Australian public, as was the governments give-away of the free public asset TV channels. They were correct in this respect of course however by about 2000 and after they had wasted hundreds of millions of dollars (shareholders funds) on what they figured were dot.com initiatives, they realised digital TV was as much a threat to them as it was to the TV broadcasters. And Telstra! (While these inferior strategic decisions cost shareholders funds the share price declines provided a good opportunity for the media oligarchs to buy up shares cheap for greater control, thereby making their digital priorities more relevant. Prevent any 4iDTV at all costs! etc.)Analog, which is the current broadcast television system and in the print realm includes physical printing plants, has a limited future, if at all, because digital is so superior in every respect including economically.Broadcast and print owners have now become more aware of these digital technologies and just how much of a threat digital is to them and the value of their assets. As successive state and federal governments (federal government makes the relevant media laws), need their traditional media propaganda machine to insure they remain in power and control, they have consistently insured this broadcast and print monopoly have remained protected from digital. This is basically why the Australian public has been denied free or near free digital technologies and that have been available for years. And being kept less than fully informed about it. (This is also why Howard gives Packer a state funeral. For services to the political status quo!)These analog assets were very valuable, are still valuable but less so if undermined partially or completely by digital. The digital revolution means possible annihilation of most things analog. Therefore these media oligarchs must either own anything digital that threatens them or must at least control it. Your governments have made this consistently possible, but of course this media monopoly is not going to broadcast to the Australian public what they have been denied because a greater awareness would mean a greater demand for technologies the monopoly does not want to deliver. To do so before they can own and control it would simply undermine and potentially destroy their assets. They have realised since about 2000 they are on the verge of being wiped out if they do not combine forces, including government, and gain full ownership and control, if at all possible, and by any means available. All Australians - except the media oligarchs- are paying a very high price for this. This cosy mateship between traditional media owners and government is clearly exposed in other obvious ways.
For example:

Firstly, why did the politicians and bureaucrats give the broadcasters billions of dollars of public assets in the form of TV channel spectrum if they were interested in delivering a state of the art digital system to Australians? Logically, the traditional broadcasters are going to do everything possible to prevent digital TV destroying their monopoly, therefore if they have the public spectrum they are able to do that, and which has been the case. With this public spectrum they have control of when and how DTV unfolds! If any government was interested in delivering digital to the public the last in any line for free spectrum would be the people who want to prevent, stifle, impede or own and control iDTV. The best way to equitably and cost-effectively deliver digital was and still is, is to auction spectrum internationally on a use it or lose it basis combined with a public funded version. Not hand it over to digitals worst enemy with limited conditions that can and have been changed by the analog media monopoly and will be again in the case of their scripted cross media solution.

Secondly, why did government and the broadcasters select a digital broadcast technology combination that is unique to Australia instead of a standard that is available and for a global market? Digital is digital. It is either on or it is off! Unlike analog technology, which is analogs weakness and inefficiency. Clearly it is more proof that the status quo is not interested in the Australian public and it was done to allow the media monopoly more time to gain ownership and control because some of the technology chosen is not available yet among many other things. It can only slow the whole delivery process to the public. Quite convenient! Also manufacturers worldwide are not going to undertake R&D and manufacture for a small and exclusive market.Furthermore, why have they made some law to attempt to prevent any new TV licence's being issued when there is clearly more than enough spectrum available for many digital channels of both high and medium quality but both superior to the existing analog TV quality. Digital provides a superiority that is beyond anything viewers have ever had and experienced. But it is imperative the media monopoly limits and restricts this information from the wider public. With no or limited digital competition the analog oligarchs can set their time frame on cruise speed, which is essentially what they are doing. And what happened to competition and globalisation imperatives? They are increasingly used selectively by the status quo as priorities require.

(Apart from parliament being dominated by lawyers, the ACCC is also where they are building empires and budgets for long-term careers. That should tell you plenty about competition or rather the lack of it. And how Australias legal profession is always in there profiteering off it.)

First in 1998 they avoid valuable auction of public assets in the form of spectrum for TV channels that would have satisfied the content requirements of the media monopoly and attracted other media interests that would have also meant diversity of ownership and opinion. That is what they are claiming they need now as cross -media law. Secondly governments have had a consistent enthusiasm for selling off public assets but it has been consistently avoided in this case simply because they need to protect their old media mates and allies. They are still avoiding any mention of any auction even though the broadcasters have deliberately avoided delivering digital and have not used the free spectrum and the analog spectrum efficiently. (Like air travel deregulation we are now in 2005 back to where we started?) So what about public interest priorities? Fooled again! Both could be auctioned off and would be worth more now in addition to helping to fund iDTV delivery to all Australians sooner or even now as in the case of 4iDTV. They have cooperated to insure this does not happen. This is clearly not in the publics interest although they have the resources and media control to claim otherwise. And research reports have also shown that it is detrimental to the development of digital technologies and the economy. However this is a democracy and laws can be changed. As they have so enthusiastically shown in the case of GST and IR laws and so on.
They have been systematically stifling the introduction and development of iDTV for over a decade now. It is essential to appreciate that as a media monopoly they are able to achieve this by only giving you minimum information, none, or their scripted propaganda. Their assets have been potentially losing some value, so they have more incentive to control what you know about this technology and its potential both for entertainment and economic benefits. Your public broadcasters are aligned with the commercial media monopoly and have already spent over $1.5 billion on imported technologies (adding more to the ICT deficit) that is not being used efficiently. They cannot undermine their public expense empires for fear of also undermining the commercial media monopoly. Hang together or end up hanging alone? The self-preservation choice- at your expense- is clear to them. The status quo resists change but as usual and particularly in this case the wider public and the nation pay the price.
Now however there is another predatory player in this war and as it is dominated by government and bureaucrats they are unequivocally aligned with the media oligarchs. This is Telstra. Because the technological infrastructure that delivers free or paid (or any form of the most efficient ) iDTV to you is also the very same infrastructure that would deliver to you unlimited bandwidth and lower cost better quality digital telephone calls whether voice or data. (This is basically why the Telstra share price can never increase and certainly not to A$7. And also certainly not with Telstra in its current form and as proposed for the total sell-off. Unless the status quo knows about a superior solution but is leaving it as money on the table for them after the total sale. It's always possible, and given the prevailing ethics, and as there are other Telstra solutions that have not been exposed in the public domain at least? Yet!)
So now we have the old broadcasters, print media and telephone businesses all aligned to stifle digital technologies unless and until they can own and control it. And the entrenched advertising buyers as they will also lose their power and profit if you have free digital TV. This is why they have made such a mess of it. It gives them time to achieve these objectives. If they can't they're history. So better to hang together than hanging alone. Despite the fact it is ridiculously and unnecessarily expensive for the nation, anti competitive and probably illegal. As digital leads to all of these old analog technologies to converge into one universal digital infrastructure so these old businesses must converge and if necessary become mates. This is anti competitive but government continues to support it. And the ACCC avoids it. The most valuable solution for the wider public is to demand 4iDTV now, which would also force this media status quo to compete and thereby insure Australians have the best digital technologies can deliver. Or, what the status quo delivers. And 4iDTV is also a more valuable and economically beneficial solution than the cross media ownership proposals once again being developed by the same media oligarchs and promoted to government as the only solution. Government will as history always proves, conform. Unless! This opportunity will not be available again and they must gain total control of all delivery systems ( which is what the politicians and bureaucrats are content to see happen for the obvious reason), or see the value of their old analog assets and business models get increasingly and rapidly undermined. You pay for this inferior "solution".
This limited number of old media assets have been engaged in a shuffling game for at least the past 20 years and if anything they have decreased in quality. But shareholders funds and the Australian public have paid for it, while the media oligarchs keep clocking up the billions or haven't you noticed, and continue to now as the status quo resists change. In fact they have destroyed jobs over this time frame whereas 4iDTV creates jobs, innovation and spin offs that are exportable worldwide. Feeding the wider public as much propaganda as is needed to achieve their objective is not an issue for this cohort. If you disagree then it is probably a good indication of just how efficient their propaganda has been and continues to be. Australian governments have failed to develop an optimal nation building digital broadcast policy that will maximise an unprecedented array of entertainment, business and economic benefits. (What else could you expect?) In fact they have failed and in the process undermined an early unique opportunity for Australia to take a leading position in a technology with assured growth. Existing policy and status is not only anti-competitive but also denies globalisation opportunities. It is not too late however! Once again there is no vision and the media oligarchs are right in there taking advantage of it at every stage. Protecting the status quo but at your expense. In a democracy you have choices. Use them or lose them. The cost of this waste of public assets and lost opportunity to date is probably more than one or two 4iDTV equivalents. Is that an acceptable price for being denied 4iDTV since 1998 and still into the future?
(4iDTV is at the very least a fourth national network but of purely multichannel digital technologies and delivery.)

Sunday, March 05, 2006

AN ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS
Email:bsqwatch@yahoo.com


Australia Needs New Political Parties Not More The Political Status Quo
- Nation Building Now And For Future Generations-
Governments are now claiming in excess of 50 cents or 50% of everyone’s dollar. After decades are you getting value for money or just more propaganda that you are? The political status quo of 50 years and more continues to promise more than they can deliver and perpetuate the model they have persisted with for decades, which is economically sub optimal and divisive despite their continuing claims it is "as good as it gets". (It isn't of course but what else can they say after living off the nation for 50 years? Logically they aren't exactly going to crow that it is not as good as it gets! We can also prove it could be better and will be happy to send proof to anyone).
However when they are all mostly now so corrupted and entrenched as vested interests (the AWB is typical of the culture and is one of many such corrupt government funded and supported entities), economically efficient nation building proves difficult to do as the past 50 years proves. Government waste and corruption over this period is unquantifiable. Mainly because once elected – whether liberal, labor, democrats, greens etc - they find they have more in common with each other than they do with the people who elected them to power. In the process they have delivered an unprecedented foreign debt and more. They have had more than enough chances to prove if long-term nation building is a priority. They are now cunningly and vigorously endeavoring to reinvent and recycle themselves for another 50 years. And a modern democratic Constitution for the people is not one of their priorities and never will be. They waffle about it to let the majority think they are interested in the area. An Economic Bill of Rights based on less government and more accountability and nation building is only possible through a new political party as it threatens the continuing power and control of the status quo. Why continue to vote for the political status quo? A foreign debt of A$600 billion plus for example is sufficient proof they have failed the nation but have entrenched themselves.A minimum of 500 names are required for a new party to be officially registered as a federal party with the Australian Electoral Office.An application for the purpose can be emailed to you and can be printed and mailed to our address. These applications will then be attached to the application and delivered to the electoral office.
If you have a name for the party you believe would be appropriate please let us know.Anyone is welcome to register and we do not discriminate. If you would like to register please indicate if you would also like to become a candidate for election to Federal Parliament and/or state government. Any other support is always welcome.
Some Of The Important Issues A New Party Has As A Priority Are:
• To downsize government and its intrusion into all aspects of Australian society
• To prioritise and encourage equitable enterprise and wealth creation to benefit all
• To address the nations foreign debt and its reduction for current and future generations
• To insure an Economic Bill of Rights now as an amendment to The Australian Constitution
• To insure an amendment that guarantees free speech is included in the Economic Bill of Rights
• To insure the minimisation of all aspects of bureaucracy and to insure remaining bureaucracy is productive and efficient
• To insure accountability and transparency across all government
• To insure all Australians and SME's have access to free multi channel interactive digital television and they benefit economically and in all other respects from digital technologies and opportunities.
• To insure media diversity of ownership and diversity of opinion
• To eliminate compulsory voting • To insure the Rule of Law is designed and applied equally and not selectively.
• To insure there is no discrimination
• To comprehensively address Tax Issues, Compliance Costs, Productivity and Efficiency

Email:bsqwatch@yahoo.com

Saturday, March 04, 2006

The Howard Government Has The Australia ID Card A Step Closer

Howard’s little Hitlers are using anything and everything to ensure they get every citizen with a national smart ID card. The latest justification for it is one of Howard’s mealy-mouthed political cronies claiming that if every citizen had one it would prevent any more illegal Cornelia Rau detentions and similar events. Only an Australian lawyer as a politician could come up with such cost-benefit logic as these events occur relatively infrequently a national ID card would be overkill. So what is the real purpose, the continuing growth of bureaucracy their empires and budgets. Once again it proves the two main laws of Australian bureaucracy. They must spend their budgets to grow their budgets and empires. And at any cost, including your rights and democracy!
The bureaucrats would be secretly pushing hard for this to ensure they expand their empires and increase their budgets.To all Australians who value what is left of democracy. They will not give up on this ID card unless you prevent it. And of course if and when they get back in government the labor party mafia will go along with the bureaucrats - despite what they say when the shadow government - to protect their power and control status.
Bury bureaucracy before it buries you! Power to the people!
Democracy gives you the choice. Use it or lose it!
An Economic Bill of Rights!

Senator Coonan Protecting Media Oligarchs While Preventing Public Interest Benefits

When Richard Alston was Howard’s Communications Minister the free to air TV (FTA-TV) oligarchs were given free spectrum for digital TV. This spectrum was and is worth billions of dollars and is a public asset. (It added a few billion more to Packers empire and although Packer always said there was only one Alan Bond, the fact is there is more than one as the government handed him billions, Bond less than a billion.) After almost 10 years the FTA-TV mafia has successfully prevented Australian’s getting Digital TV. That is, it denied competition and ensured the media oligarchs and the government maintain the status quo. That is, a propaganda machine where the government manipulates the majority and the media oligarchs profiteer with their license to print money, which they then donate to the political status quo to keep them in power where they can continue to protect the media oligarchs. You should get the gist of it by now!
Now Coonan has again handed over public spectrum worth a billion or more to the same radio media oligarchs with the ludicrous and now easily disproven assertion that it will encourage investment in digital radio. (Exactly the same thing Howard and Alston said when the gave FTA-TV oligarchs, including Packer, free digital spectrum. And we will be posting some analysis shortly.) And what are Australians doing about it? Again nothing!Once again the public is ignoring the give-away of their valuable assets to be used to prevent the public getting digital radio. Like FTA-TV the same oligarchs will prevent digital innovation and not use the digital spectrum because it threatens their old analog assets. Alston was rewarded by being made ambassador in London. What will Coonan’s pay-off be to keep the Howard coalition's media mates onside for a propaganda machine and political power?
Dangerously Howard now clearly believes his own hubris and humbug but when surrounded by so many sycophants it happens as we found out in with the extended tenure of the labor party mafia as carpet bagger Keating made off with his payolla, including millions handed to him via Lake Technologies etc.
The universally proven way to maximize and optimize any development including technology is thru competition. Something this government claims to represent. But what would a bunch of Australian lawyers/politicians know about competition?
( Two years ago when Coonan was in the Finance portfolio she came across as an expert on consumer savings and so on. Now she wants you to believe she is an expert on ICT. If you believe it you can consider yourself brainwashed. )
With Australia’s A$600 billion foreign debt among many other relevancies, the answer is obvious. Wakeup Ozzies or kiss more of your digital assets goodbye! And continue to watch reruns and recycled cheap content while less than a handful of media oligarchs and their heirs clip coupons in tax free havens at your expense.

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Some Australian Values?

Australia- Certified Banana Republic Or World Class Efficient Democracy?

Is AWB and Institutionalized Government Corruption Being Cunningly Buried


The omissions in the Cole commissions terms of reference should be raising some questions in the US and other countries and clearly the Australian government is counting on a white – wash, and the value of time and short memories to protect the insidious corruption over decades, from being more thoroughly exposed as being worse than the third - world they are always also using as scapegoats to hide a homegrown culture that has over decades contributed to entrenching a corrupt unaccountable class of bureaucrat and Australia’s growing foreign debt among many other economic deficiencies. The fundamental reasons for the perpetuation of these insidious monopolies will not get exposed although eventually we will attempt to publish on this subject. Naturally we don’t expect to receive government assistance for the research and work.

The Cole commission into the UN oil for food corruption should at least look at some related history for confirmation of the dominant culture that exists throughout these bureaucracies across Australia and why. That they decline to is more proof of the royal coverup through the use of a constrained royal commission as a convenient vehicle. With the help of the local media monopoly the public can be manipulated to believe the government is acting in the public interest. Fooled again!
It might take a look at the ANAO reports about MRC and AMLC about 10 years ago, two typical corrupt SMA (Statutory Marketing Authorities) bureaucracies that have flourished for years under both the Coalition and Labor. The ANAO produced 2 reports on this SMA although their efforts were typical in that they were meant to convey the impression voters were being protected. In this example it is noteworthy there were no charges of any kind against participants and in fact the main players typically moved on through the network, which also includes AWB and other relevant bureaucracies. In other words they were all rewarded for their corruption over more than a decade, including it should be noted and as in AWB, the in-house lawyers. They know they are immune from prosecution of any kind. The public gets conveniently bamboozled! It needs a compliant media to achieve this so successfully. (One of a number of reasons why media oligarch Kerry Packer deserves a state funeral according to Howard – and the shadow government would do the same for the same reasons.)
In all likelihood Cole probably doesn’t want to dig too deep because once again the local law profession might get a bit more of its image tarnished. Howard’s cabinet is dominated by lawyers so there would be a natural mutual interest in avoiding over- explicit exposure in this regard. Once again another example of how logic and probability are selectively applied in the “public interest”.
In fact the ANAO and their state equivalents are a good source of information that contributes to a form of history of documented evidence of how inept and profligate Australian bureaucracy is. (see quote below)
Basically SMA’s have been a means for the political status quo to fund their power but the National Party (previously the Country Party) have been setting themselves and their mates up by allocating each other positions in these networks of GBE’s for favours for decades. The corruption really took seed and became deep rooted during the labor party tenure from 1983 onwards. Unfortunately the true nature of these entities can never be exposed to the voters and it should be curious to anyone why there have never been any academics zero in on this subject. (Not to mention the media of course but we now know why this can never be expected to happen.) They have the potential to produce a steady stream of Phd’s. Clearly digging too deep and documenting it is not a good career move. And it is not surprising to find an academic stating on TV that to a certain extent corruption should be tolerated. Not surprising as Australian universities have dubious ethics in a range of areas in that regard. Many of the product end up in government where the networks of insiders get extended and so forth.
Emeritus Professor Helen Hughes has published some controversial information and on Austrade/DFAT but it is understood this presented security of tenure risks over a long period. Austrade has been a corrupt unaccountable bureaucracy for at least 2 decades and continues to squander billions on their empire and dual career paths for mandarins. Undoubtedly as an export incentive provider they have used these billions to assist AWB over years and should be subpoenaed. ( No coincidence Minchin moved so quickly to prevent it.) DFAT had control of the UN oil for food transactions from the first week the relevant resolution was passed by the UN and anyone wanting to participate had to deal with DFAT and their corrupt and wasteful bureaucrats. They used this status to also filter participants and if anyone not part of the network wanted to engage in oil for food business they could be eliminated by DFAT/Austrade whereby their network would engage in the business opportunity handed to them by others. Plagiarism and misappropriation of business intellectual property is common across this mafia of public and private bureaucracy. Undoubtedly it includes a string of compromised legal professionals and therefore it can be understood why the terms of reference are so limited. Senator Minchin (a lawyer!) has used (abused) his status as a peoples representative to gag parliament and any bureaucracy that might be relevant to fully informing the Australian voter. In fact it’s likely Senator Norm Coleman was gagged as a favour also? Nice timing!
The way these SMA/GBE’s work for the National Party and their liberal party mates is not well known for obvious reasons. Basically a network of farmers (many are the descendants of early recipients of rural holdings for political favours so the culture is strong and of course valuable) have become entrenched over decades (there are many typical examples in state and federal government) and they use their incomes and perquisites from careers in politics and/or positions on GBE’s/SMA’s to subsidise their farming assets, because many of them are unable to make decent returns year in and year out off the land, and so to avoid getting in the handout category that many farmers are, they become part of this group and network. The extra (always large from government directly and indirectly) incomes are used with their farm assets to tax shelter themselves and also accumulate more farm assets from distressed farmers who are not part of this network and of course cannot be part of it and have no extra incomes at least of comparable value. The full extent of these government funded networks and how they benefit these politicians and mandarins (and their respective parties) has never been researched although it as an area we hope to publish on once we find sufficient resources. Perhaps the only way to get diversity in Australia (and expose the status quo and their control and corruption) is to go through media in other countries and develop an independent local media.
John Anderson the previous deputy PM is also typical and under the circumstances is yet another of a long list of stakeholders who should be subpoenaed. Many of this cohort have not farmed during their lifetime and this group has became known as the Pitt and Collins Street farmers. (No coincidence a Victorian wheat farmer is chairman of Telstra and was head of the NFF previously!) But most Australians have never understood how it really works. Again for obvious reasons! And one of the results after decades is that the bureaucrats (technocrats) gradually became part of their group and got control of the day to day running of these SMA’s - for loyalty rewards - and bureaucracies and expanded them so that the politically involved farming establishment and the technocrats could both milk the system. They have grown since and so has the corruption as a result. Without accountability in the sense that none have ever been charged but instead rewarded, the troughs have gotten deeper with more snouts to feed. Eventually corruption became institutionalized and systemic as a consequence of an incestuous network of monopolies. Unfortunately over decades these vested interests basically divided farmers into an in-group and an out-group. Looking too hard at such an insidious collection of monopolies has been persistently avoided by both major political parties and with the result the corruption as elsewhere across Australia’s bureaucracies, became part of the culture as it is today and will remain so. Unfortunately they can’t seem to distinguish between normal business practices and corruption. (A product perhaps of Australia’s universities as noted).And the public only ever gets to see deliberately confusing fragments of it such as now with AWB. Undoubtedly Cole is meant to blindside the public and it can be said with certainty there will be no charges made against any participants. Logically if there were Cole and the government would be exposed in a court and the terms of reference would have to be expanded, which would implicate all of those both the government and Cole have chosen to protect currently. Under the circumstances better to bamboozle the gullible public! Keep everything away from a court at any cost.
There will be a report, of course, but no China- equivalent trials of bureaucrats will happen here, now or ever. None of them lined up in chains in a court unfortunately.
Mr. Downer (DFAT) for example is a farm asset owner and uses the incomes from political positions (apparently his wife is in on a second government income source also?) to subsidise his family investments. (By the way this status also conflicts with the making of more equitable public benefit laws but for another time perhaps). Basically this is why so few of them in fact actually attempt farming as a full time career. Why bother when there are so many troughs available. Given the difficulty of consistent returns from farming they know it is a priority if they are to retain and build their agricultural assets, to collect other incomes and of course being government they can make them appear as required. So a path into politics and SMA’s has been a first priority and many of them know little else. If they leave politics they almost always do so with a lifetime indexed pension plus various positions in these SMA’s and related bureaucracies and consultancies. It is clear there is a lot more at stake here than AWB’s corruption!
Tim Fischer (a farm asset owner) for example went from Minister of DFAT (Cole must get Fischer and Anderson in for questioning if serious) and quit when the MRC and associated corruption was exposed (reluctantly the bureaucrats had to investigate it because some outsiders uncovered the beef industry SMA mafia etc) and was rewarded by Howard with the position of head of Australia’s Tourism Commission and so on and on it goes.
The ozzy media of course rarely if ever exposes this because for example the media oligarchs are profiteering from it. The Packer interests have large investments in Australian farm production and processing and so do some of his long-time mates of the media oligarchy, including Rupert Murdoch. So Australians reliably get kept in the dark about this agricultural industry mafia. Naturally the outcome eventually is going to lead to blatant corruption like the Australian Wheat Board, which by the way was approved for stock market listing based on this corruption and has not been suspended from trading, which must make the ASX look a bit dodgy under the circumstances.
Of course any monopoly will eventually become corrupted and especially when it is tapped into the unlimited resources of national and state governments and protected by successive corrupt political interests.
Howard, Downer, Fischer, Anderson and many others new the AWB was corrupt but in Australia there is a long list of bureaucracies that exist and perpetuate themselves based on corruption. It’s the culture these days and is institutionalized. The norm not the exception! But maybe Cole already knows this so is really putting on a show for public consumption. (Basically their version of what else can they do ?) If history is a reliable guide there could well be many horizontal promotions and lucrative retirements. (Now with the help of the multibillion dollar Future Fund Australians have funded for these corrupt bureaucrats.)

For the chief of state under modern conditions, a limiting factor is too many subjects and problems in too many areas of government to allow solid understanding of any of them , and too little time to think between fifteen minute appointments and thirty page briefs. This leaves the field open to protective stupidity. Meanwhile bureaucracy, safely repeating today what it did yesterday, rolls on as ineluctably as some vast computer , which once penetrated by error, duplicates it forever.”Barbara W. Tuchman, The March of Folly:From Troy To Vietnam

It might also be said that even if they do understand there is a great deal that is preferably avoided. The AMLC/MRC corruption went on for about 15 years and they still operate on basically the same model. It’s a nice money spinner for many of the same cohort.
Cole should also investigate the SES – Senior Executive Service mafia. Many have used inside information and Austrade’s multibillion dollar resources as one example to underwrite their business priorities. Probably one of the most successful at this game has been a Mr. Bill Ferris ex head of Austrade/DFAT, who has become visibly considerably wealthy through these networks and organizations. Many others exist and they are not hard to find and expose if anyone wants to look, including the local media, which rarely does of course so they have contributed to the development of this culture of corruption and as they benefit from it in various consistently profitable ways.
Over decades as politicians come and go the bureaucrats remain and over decades Australia’s bureaucracy has developed a culture of secrecy, lack of accountability and corruption and cover-up that makes third world countries look tame by comparison. That means they also have a natural affinity to the game and fit in to the demands and needs of Iraq and so on.Of course the Cole commission probably doesn’t want to be guided towards the obvious and that would clearly contribute to proving the culture that dominates Australia’s bureaucracies.
Ausindustry and Industry Assistance are two more examples of bureaucrats with control of the allocation of billions each year but this would basically require a Royal Commission into Australia’s bureaucracy, which is never going to happen of course.

Many of these bureaucrats have enriched themselves as mentioned and developed commercial business interests underwritten both in use and abuse of public financial capital and intellectual capital. To the extent it has also stifled new industry, new job and new wealth creation. To what extent this has contributed to the nations growing A$600 billion foreign debt is not known but could be if anyone wanted to find out and had a fraction of the resources these corrupt governments have squandered over decades.But it is doubtful the Cole Commission has the backbone to dig that deep because after-all it might expose more of Australia’s corrupt bureaucracy and how it directly and indirectly subsidises the perpetuation of the 2 main parties and their power and so on. The status quo couldn’t tolerate that kind of exposure. And it is clear already that the AWB and other bureaucrats and politicians know they will walk away from this outrageous abuse. Banana republic stuff and Australia is going for gold!

In addition there is sufficient evidence to indicate that AWB (and again probably Austrade/DFAT at least) has had corrupt relationships with Indonesia and China for example over a long period to gain consistent wheat deals. In fact to the extent it has denied the development of more high quality value added industries in Australia and the appropriate export culture. But again the government would not want this opened unless of course it burst open as blatantly as AWB and Iraq has. And if Australia has been supplying wheat to Iraq for 58 years then when did the payoffs begin and are the AWB, DFAT bureaucrats and politicians getting exposed currently, simply carrying the baton that has been passed to them from previous stakeholders? And given the UN bureaucrats have an equivalent culture presented with the opportunity as they so often are, it seems international bureaucracy is more insidious than most people are aware of and in fact has a common agenda based on a fundamental flaw in human nature. Also further proof exists that bureaucracy and its insidious culture has gone global in the fact the Volker/UN oil for food report identified over 50 companies in many countries as participants in the UN inspired corruption and that none except Australia apparently have initiated any form of public inquiry and accountability. However Australia only initiated an inquiry because the Australian Wheat Board was so blatantly a long-term participant and not to do so would have exposed Australia as having blatant double standards. Australian government has a difficult and complex public relations and propaganda exercise to implement to keep the public bamboozled sufficiently to make them believe the rule of law has prevailed. Unfortunately Australians will accept this and if they do decide to do anything about it they will invariably vote for the labor party mafia at the next changing of the status quo. This, of course is no solution, as the labor party mafia during its long tenure allowed the culture to flourish and also led to the majority voting to give Howard and his coalition more power than they have ever had. Australians don’t seem to comprehend that this entrenched political status quo is in effect a form of monopoly that has allowed an insidious corrupt and unaccountable bureaucracy to prosper until it and its corruption is institutionalized and that the only way to eradicate it is to vote for a party that is serious about an Economic Bill of Rights, whereby government can be downsized and made accountable. Failing to do so is likely to see a further erosion of their democracy. Kiss paradise goodbye! But is it paradise or just the perception of paradise as over decades successive governments with the help of their media oligarch mates have gotten Australians to believe that it is? Once again the power of propaganda!
Maybe US wheat growers would be doing Australians a favour if they forced competitive industry development across the wheat (and ag) industry. But the local propaganda machine would probably make sure it was never seen in this context, but as a threat to Australia’s agriculture.


Another Interesting Example Of Corrupt Australian Bureaucracy At Work

The Statistics Made Redundant To Keep Bureaucrats Employed?


Centrelink and their extensive secretive and unaccountable network of public and private bureaucracies need a large percentage of society dependent on them. This ensures they can maintain their corrupt empire and grow their multibillion dollar budgets. And they are at it again in 2006 as they advertise to their network of corrupt mates to “tender” for contracts for their version of a jobs network solution. Created by bureaucrats for bureaucrats.
The Jobs Networks (JN), NEIS, CWC, DOES, PSP,JPET and anything else that will keep their corrupt public and private empires like Centrelink going and their budgets spent has also contributed to undermining entrepreneurship and an export culture.
Australians need some answers (but first they need to know what question to ask) about why Centrelink is getting bigger and its budgets are growing when unemployment according to government, has declined from 15% to 5%. If there are fewer unemployed then why does this vast corrupt network of public and private bureaucracy need to be the same size (or larger) as when unemployment was at 15%?
They do not want full employment! The bureaucrats would lose their network and Centrelink empire and they would all need to get real jobs instead of being typical little Hitler’s living off fellow Australian’s. Howard would rather keep propping them up and their corrupt Jobs Network mates with billions than use the money for new industry, new job and new wealth creation. It is now an industry and given ozzy bureaucracy probably can’t be dismantled. So the show continues. They prefer a growing A$600 billion foreign debt than reducing it. Anything to keep the empires intact and now they reckon they deserve their very own slush fund trough - The Future Fund – funded by the majority but unbeknownst to them. Obviously given their handiwork over decades they believe they deserve it.
Howard’s coalition crusaders have also found innovative ways to transfer public wealth to religious organizations who are more than happy (given history no surprise and keeping up the crusaders tradition – loot, pillage etc…) to profiteer off this critical mass of 5% (?) to 15% (?) fodder. Recently the Salvation Army Plus Job Network agency was exposed up to its humanitarian eyeballs in corruption as it engaged in illegal activities to divert over A$10 million from government. They repaid the A$9 million and are still in the jobs network. (Rewarding the crimes! Is it any wonder then AWB and the rest of ozzy bureaucracy is so inspired? The trough feeders!) This is equivalent to bank robbers handing their gains back after getting caught. Or, like the few individuals caught by Centrelink cheating the government for a few thousand dollars. Invariably they get convicted and often jail time. Another one of Howard’s religious mates Hillsong also got caught with its snout in the trough. And so on and on it goes. Howard’s old mate runs the Salvation Army!
Australia it seems is now governed by a cadre the equivalent of the three wise monkeys!
What do Centrelink, Australian Wheat Board, Austrade, Ausindustry, Jobs Network, NEIS, DFAT and a string of state and federal bureaucracies have in common? An entrenched insidious corrupt network of zealous bureaucrats and ex – bureaucrats! Underwriting their interests using vast taxpayer resources through a confusing complex array of schemes and programs, reinvented and recycled for the purpose.They are capable of creating any kind of so-called solutions to keep their budgets spent and to protect their jobs! Every week this network of public and private bureaucrats dream up something new to keep their vulnerable victims running around wasting time, money and energy to generate statistics for these counterproductive bureaucrats. An old-boys and old-girls network of bureaucrats and ex-bureaucrats.
As the Cole commission is reluctantly exposing, Australia’s bureaucrats are a mafia and the whole bureaucracy should be exposed through a royal commission. Then what? Smaller and less expensive government of course!
This network is underwriting their own extensive business interests and dual career paths using these billions and Australia’s elected representatives ignore it by constantly promoting skills shortages and other diversions including scapegoating the victims. Despite age discrimination laws discrimination is rampant across Australia and Howard (and Beazley and co) is in convenient denial. They would rather waste billions on useless counterproductive bureaucrats than use funds to create new industry, new jobs and new wealth. No surprises therefore the foreign debt keeps building.The bureaucrats have devised a range of clever statistics generating "solutions" to provide data that ABS ( Australian Bureau of Statistics ) uses to claim unemployment has never been healthier, which the politicians quickly use to crow about. The RBA governor claims at 5 % its as good as it can ever be (what else could he say? Although would anyone trust the opinion of an ozzy mandarin these days? Unfortunately it seems so.) Meanwhile a local academic – a rare example – suggests that unemployment is in fact over 10 %. Which would explain why the Centrelink mafia is still a growing empire with a growing budget. And also reduce the RBA governors version of the state of affairs to the humbug it is. Interestingly these two views were published on the same day in the same Fairfax Media newspaper, the Australian Financial Review, and apparently the content producers are not abale to join the dots in a basic attempt to explain the conflict. But of course this is not what ozzy content producers do, if they want to get a career and protect it. Conform to get in and conform to remain in. Anyone concerned about the nazi holocaust equivalent occurring again should wake up to the fact the same culture prevails in 2006. Perhaps it should be acknowledged as a fundamental flaw in human nature as a survival instinct, which means of course and inevitably such horrors will occur again and in fact have been in one form or another over the past 50 years. It seems governments anywhere are capable of anything to protect empires and the tyranny of the status quo, to repeat history and never to admit to having erred. The formula?
Australian’s seem to have been so succesfully brainwashed over decades they believe they have a world class media that keeps them fully informed, which is probably certain proof of how efficient the brainwashing is.

Massively inefficient (and corrupt) Australian governments now claim 50 cents of everyone’s dollar and this is an increase from 15 cents about 30 years ago. Or, from about A$20 billion in federal government revenue to over A$200 billion per year today. Given such a rate of growth and the dominance of Australian bureaucracy over every aspect of Australia’s democracy, where is it likely to end up in another 30 years? Seventy five cents in the dollar!?
And given the laws that drive Australian bureaucracy to what extent is democracy itself threatened?
(Howard’s little Hitler’s are using anything and everything to ensure they get every citizen with a national smart ID card, which is another example of the measures bureaucracy will take to justify growing empires and budgets.)Never under any circumstances give back one dollar of any budget once achieved; and do anything and everything possible to increase that budget. The empires must grow at any cost.The solution is not so difficult, the execution however presents a challenge.


Who Benefits?
Howards Cronulla Contribution – How Propaganda Backfires?

As the Ozzy media status quo goes through the usual politically convenient exercise to get to the source of the Cronulla rampage, they yet again expose themselves as being programmed to avoid identifying and exposing government as the likely cause. Don’t bite the hand that feeds, just convey the impression.
Howard is the trigger for this rampage and it should be obvious. How so ?
It isn’t difficult but it clearly is for the media status quo as decades of being the profiteering propaganda machine for successive governments has defined their concept of what an open media encouraging diversity of opinion means. Australian’s over decades of this media monopoly have become programmed to accept their narrow view and version of the world, now believing it is the best that can be achieved in a free and democratic society. Such is the power of propaganda!
Howard and his coalition of crusaders have spent a number of years, especially since 9/11 constantly and relentlessly attacking the Mid - East and of course people of “Mid - East appearance”, for obvious reasons. Eventually this self - serving and orchestrated propaganda is going to do what propaganda and brainwashing are designed to do. In this case to eventually confirm to the Anglo-European Ozzy that it will be acceptable to turn on the source of much of what Howard and his cabinet view ( mainly Ozzy lawyers so once again the question of logic and probability), for political expediency, as the scourge of everything these cunning cocooned political manipulators convey as being worthy of being called civilization.Naturally enough as anyone in advertising and marketing would know (and employed by all of the political status quo at taxpayer’s expense) the message will sink in and in this case it has with the added benefit the politicians and bureaucrats at many levels, including state, can use the results to justify bigger empires, bigger budgets and greater control over society. (For example they have by now lost just about all credibility on their expensive, boof-headed war on drugs and needed a new reason to justify bigger budgets and empire building. Communism more or less is attempting to adopt variations of capitalism and so on. Thanks al-Qaeda! The new bogey – man!)The detonator as it were has been the new laws to fight terrorism. There was a long drawn out subtle but relentless government PR campaign and build up to this event and when finalized there was the appropriate additional government propaganda to attempt to prove how necessary they were. (Don’t worry folks we want you to get your moneys worth so we will quickly swoop on identified terrorist suspects). Of course terrorism as it is now understood through media manipulation, has been a boon for governments and many bureaucrats must be secretly grateful it happened along to give them an open cheque book on expanding their empires and increasing their budgets. They are now in full flight and anything goes. It is an unprecedented opportunity for the political status quo and the gravy train of bureaucrats (the insidious new class) and their empires to gain even more control over the masses and no opportunity is being ignored. They now see it as a unique opportunity for an ID card, biometric passports and other such documents, compulsory or nearly so, universal psychometric testing, and more.Howard has proven time and time again that he is either a pathological liar or deviously cunning in his manipulation of and contempt for the Australian people disguised as the opposite. Thanks to the local media monopoly most Australian’s are conveniently bamboozled and as they voted for the political status quo they are unlikely to declare they were badly informed and even manipulated by any vigorous protests against Howard and co.
The Cronulla clashes occurred because of Howard and his relentless self - serving propaganda. And it should be acknowledged. This is Australia’s leadership! To divert the publics attention from identifying this he and his coalition crusaders then immediately scapegoated anything and everything in sight including the state labor party mafia over deliberately manipulating resources to the eastern suburbs areas, which happens to be the coalitions electorate.
Then to quickly use the free to air TV propaganda machine in typical style and enthusiasm and claim Australia is not a racist country. This is what the result is after decades ensconced and encased in the political cocoon that is the political status quo. Anything Howard knows about the Australian people he gets fed to him through layers of sycophants with dual career paths their priority. Variations of the AWB model!
But that he persists probably says more about Australians. And of course voting for the labor party mafia as a solution would be rewarding them for Howard’s and the coalitions prevailing status.
Clever country indeed!